Report: Rochesterians eager for change in local news coverage

Print More
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

It’s clear that local news coverage, amid nationwide contractions, is not what it used to be. A new report sheds light on how some locals consume and feel about the city’s media.

Supported by The Lenfest Institute for Journalism, the statewide nonprofit newsroom New York Focus kicked off a listening tour across four New York communities last year, along with an online survey, to gain a sense of how the state’s residents consume, engage and think about local news.

Surveyors convened small groups in Albany, Potsdam, Rochester and Syracuse to discuss the challenges local residents face in gaining access to information and their attitude towards media coverage of their communities. Their responses, the report says, showed that New Yorkers and newsrooms alike are eager for change, and that information gaps are contributing to residents’ feelings of scarcity.

A group of 21 Rochesterians who met in October 2023 expressed a desire for more information and for changes to media coverage. According to the report, many attendees wanted to better understand how decisions are made in Rochester but were frustrated at the time it takes to get information.

“You have to turn it into a hobby to show up,” said one resident quoted in the report, referring to municipal and school board meetings.

Local residents wanted more information about school board meetings, county government and judges in particular, and one resident said they are more likely to consume this news passively via TV or radio because the search for alternate sources of information isn’t easy.

In a similar vein, even though local media coverage has declined in scope, some attendees even expressed fatigue at keeping up with the local coverage that does exist. It takes time, money and energy.

“With the income disparity in Rochester, there are a lot of people who don’t seek out news because it seems pointless, or overwhelming and depressing,” said another resident in the report. “People therefore don’t have access to news that could actually empower them and give them some hope.”

Indeed, the perceived negative tone of reporting about Rochester was another sticking point for attendees. Some said that people are more pessimistic about Rochester relative to other upstate cities and that this pessimism is reflected in media depictions of the city.

“It often sounds like Rochester is a dead or dying town since Kodak and Xerox have passed their prime,” wrote one of the 164 respondents in New York Focus’ statewide survey.

While pushing back against the picture of Rochester as a “city in decline,” the attendees still raised serious concerns about the city’s challenges, like poverty, housing affordability and economic development.

Those who attended the listening session also scrutinized the shape of local crime coverage, criticizing reporters for potentially leaning on the same sources, like a former police chief or the chamber of commerce, when reporting on public safety. Several attendees expressed a desire for a more in-depth approach centered on data, accountability and potential policy solutions to crime.

Many of the Rochesterians’ concerns were reflected across the state. According to the report, local crime coverage across New York was denigrated as too sensational and not informative, and residents elsewhere in the state also faced obstacles in accessing basic civic information and navigating state systems.

Residents statewide also felt they needed to be hyper-engaged to find the information they need to participate democratically, the report says. These perceived information gaps worsened residents’ abilities to deal with a host of issues across the state—like housing, poverty, public health, immigration and others.

At the end of its listening tour, New York Focus drew two conclusions from the discussions. The report argues collaboration is key to the future of local journalism in the state and meeting residents’ information needs. And, community listening is a critical way for New York’s newsrooms to hear about residents’ information needs.

“Collaboration won’t be the only answer to the disappearance of local news and information across the state: addressing these information gaps will also require policy change and new models for information sharing,” the report states. “But collaboration is, and will remain, key.”


Justin O’Connor is a Rochester Beacon contributing writer.
 The Beacon welcomes comments and letters from readers who adhere to our comment policy including use of their full, real nameSee “Leave a Reply” below to discuss on this post. Comments of a general nature may be submitted to the Letters page by emailing  [email protected]

Our Nonprofit Newsroom Needs Your Support

The Rochester Beacon’s journalists are dedicated to bringing you high-quality local news and analysis. As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit news outlet, we rely on donations from the community to stay paywall-free. Make a tax-deductible contribution today to support our hardworking journalists—and NewsMatch will double your donation.

6 thoughts on “Report: Rochesterians eager for change in local news coverage

  1. This is no surprise. The D&C is mostly the USA Today digest and local TV offers mostly sensational local news, weather, and lifestyle reporting. I get most of my local and regional news from a daily WXXI e-mail newsletter and the Beacon, although neither is nearly comprehensive. Only a few local advertisers support local media and many former subscribers to print media balk at the current cost of a subscription. This makes local reporting uneconomical for these media. While the Beacon has worthwhile articles, it seems they often relate more to the specific interests of the writers than to the importance of the information. Nevertheless, I have supported the Beacon with some contributions. I do not have a solution, but I hope some creative soul will come up with one.

  2. Quoting Tip O’Neill, Massachusetts Member of the House of Representative and Speaker for many years, “All politics is local.”

    This means large P or small p. This is where the action is and where local news reporting should focus.

  3. Once we jettison the whining, predominetly from the NeoCons, that there is a Big Bad Main Stream Media conspiracy to manipulate the news coverage for some undefined end, then what we’re left with are conclusions about the failings of local media outlets that are so obvious that we hardly required this survey to arrive at them. What is actually needed is a survey of the management of the local news outlets asking them to justify, without the use of the phrase (or its equivalent) “corporate”profits,” their policies and actions/lack of actions and their apparent addiction to the posting of fluff and blatant advertising on their social media sites.

  4. Thank you Justin for this coverage. I work in one area that does not get sufficient coverage: the care of people experiencing homelessness. Why are there not stories that link DHS practices with the perpetual struggle of some to get out of homelessness? A recent study reveals that Monroe County uses its “sanctioning” authority as a punitive effort to control behavior. Monroe County has the worst record among surrounding counties for punishing people who already traumatized for the failures to meet the requirements of DHS. Why no story on the lack of truly affordable and safe housing in our community making it impossible to meet the DHS requirement to search for housing? Why no story on shelters forced to close due to lack of timely reimbursement for beds provided to people experiencing homelessness? How about a study of the potentially more effective solution of giving block grants to shelters so that they can pay staff on time etc? How about a story on how to access how decisions are made at the County level on the distribution of funds made available by the State? Why has the County decided that for Code Blue providing 70+ beds is sufficient when the last Point in Time count reported almost 1000 people sleeping rough?

  5. The need for better local news coverage is real, but here’s the challenge: Would area consumers pay money to support quality reporting? Or do they just expect the News Fairy to make it pop up on their phone screens?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *