Even one traffic fatality or serious injury is too many

Print More
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

Eight months ago, Mayor Malik Evans announced that Rochester would embrace a national initiative called Vision Zero that aims to eliminate traffic fatalities and severe injuries while increasing safe, healthy, equitable mobility for all.

Last week, Evans spoke at a Rochester Beacon community forum on Vision Zero, describing the initiative in detail and explaining why he has made it a priority for the city.

The event, held Feb. 12 at the Central Library, was sponsored by Canandaigua National Bank and Passero Associates, with additional support from Gallina Development.

Here are Evans’ prepared remarks for the Beacon’s Vision Zero community forum.

______

Good morning, and thank you all for being here today.

It’s very gratifying to see so many people take an interest in our ROC Vision Zero initiative to make Rochester’s streets, roadways and sidewalks safer for everybody.

Thank you as well to today’s guest, Juan Martinez from the New York City Vision Zero Advisory Committee, for traveling to Rochester to share your insights and success stories on New York City’s Vision Zero initiative.

Malik Evans

And thank you to those on today’s panel for coming here to talk about the progress of ROC Vision Zero, including Councilmember Mitch Gruber.

Finally, thank you to Kent Gardner and the people from the Rochester Beacon for elevating this very important conversation on roadway safety.

I’m very proud that Rochester is the only city in the state outside of New York to adopt the Vision Zero initiative to eliminate all traffic fatalities and serious injuries.

The importance of this plan came into stark relief in 2023, after we drafted Rochester’s very first Active Transportation Plan, which changes the paradigm away from vehicle-centric priorities to include improving conditions for pedestrians, children, bicycle commuters and others.

During our studies for this plan, we saw that Rochester has more traffic fatalities than any of our peer cities in New York: Buffalo, Syracuse, Albany and Yonkers.

From 2017 to 2021, Rochester had an average of 17 traffic fatalities per year, compared to 14 for Buffalo, which has a higher population than we do.

The other cities’ averages were all in the single digits.

There’s no way anyone could look at those numbers and not do anything about them.

ROC Vision Zero is going to save lives and reduce the incredible amounts of suffering that comes from these crashes.

I know people who have lost loved ones to vehicle crashes.

I know people whose lives have been changed forever after they or someone they love has been seriously injured in a crash.

Believe me, their pain is just as tragic, just as heartbreaking, as those who are affected by homicides or opioid overdoses.

They deserve the same level of attention—the same level of justice—that we apply to violence and addiction. And that’s what we’re doing with ROC Vision Zero.

In many ways, the actual name of the initiative—Vision Zero—is one of its most critical components: to achieve ZERO fatalities and ZERO serious injuries.

Some people may think that goal is unrealistic …

That we should strive to just reduce fatalities and serious injuries.

But think about the undertones of that mindset.

The Rochester Police Department doesn’t strive to reduce homicides. They strive for zero. Because even one homicide is too many.

The Rochester Fire Department doesn’t strive to reduce fatal fires. They strive for zero. Because even one fire fatality is too many.

So, even before we begin to implement the strategies laid out in ROC Vision Zero, we’re starting out with a loud and clear statement: Even one traffic fatality or serious injury is too many.

We strive for zero.

Furthermore, achieving zero traffic fatalities and serious injuries is more than a mindset shift. It’s a very realistic goal because crashes that result in deaths or serious injuries are preventable.

Achieving zero can be done. Therefore, it should be done.

And I am very proud to be the first mayor of Rochester to say, in our city, it will be done.

ROC Vision Zero is our blueprint to do that.

ROC Vision Zero lays out a very realistic and achievable path to zero traffic deaths and serious injuries…

A path that takes us from changing our collective mindset on how and why they happen …

Through our methods to influence behavior on the roads and enforce vehicle and traffic laws …

And right on to the way we design our streets and sidewalks.

ROC Vision Zero is our blueprint to do all that with what we call the three E’s: Education, Enforcement and Engineering.

The education component begins, as I said, with changing the mindset around traffic deaths and fatalities to make sure people understand these crashes are preventable.

They’re not inevitable. They won’t, as Jesus said of the poor, always be with us.

That’s why we don’t call them accidents anymore. We call them crashes, because the word accident implies nobody was at fault.

But, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 94 percent of all crashes—whether there’s an injury or not—are caused by human error.

In fact, error isn’t even the right word for that stat.

It should be human behavior. Because the leading factors are:

■ drunk driving;

■ distracted driving;

■ reckless driving;

■ speeding;

■ and failure to obey traffic laws.

Those aren’t errors.

Those aren’t accidents.

They’re behaviors.

They’re decisions.

They’re decisions people make when they get behind the wheel. And we’re not going to excuse the consequences of those decisions by calling them accidents.

As a part of ROC Vision Zero, we’re going put together education and communications campaigns that will start a community conversation about these decisions.

And because we know the one thing that influences human behavior more than anything is other humans, we’re going to recruit Traffic Safety Champions to help lead those conversations.

I’m sure many of the people in this room would make great Traffic Safety Champions.

Enforcement is the next E.

Unfortunately, we can’t rely on everybody to make the right decision—even when they’re aware of the consequences.

So, we have to find new ways to enforce our vehicle and traffic laws.

This includes lowering the city’s default speed limit from 30 to 25 miles per hour and incorporating automated enforcement tools, including speed cameras.

A 5-mile-per-hour reduction in the speed limit will have little to no impact on travel times.

But it will increase stopping times for motorists; give pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists more time to see each other; and it will lower the velocity of collisions, which reduces the risk of death or serious injury from a crash.

Speeding is a major concern for our residents.

It’s among the top complaints we receive at City Hall, and speed humps are among the top requests from residents in our neighborhoods.

It’s not realistic, and not even very effective, to dramatically step up police enforcement for speed limits …

… so we’re looking to implement an automated speed camera program like they have in New York City—where a recent report found a 14 percent reduction in traffic deaths and injuries in areas with speed cameras.

We’re well aware of the concern that this could have a disproportionate impact on low-income and minority drivers, so we’re going to take steps to make sure our program is rolled out in an equitable manner.

We also have to remember that the people who are disproportionately impacted by traffic fatalities and serious accidents are the black and brown members of our community.

I know Councilman Gruber, who is a member of the Vision Zero Task Force, has been studying how this has been achieved in other cities and has a lot of thoughts on it.

I understand Juan Martinez helped lead these efforts in New York City. It’ll be interesting to hear his perspective on this.

We’re also moving forward with a program to install cameras on the stop-sign arms of school buses to catch motorists who pass buses while children are getting on or off.

I know Councilmember (Bridget) Monroe has a personal interest in this issue and is very eager to see it through.

On the engineering front, I’m very excited about some of the ROC Vision Zero plans to redesign our roadways to make them safer.

Especially because we’ve been very successful in applying for state and federal grants to advance some of these projects.

We’ve been awarded more than $30 million for projects that include exploring a major redesign of Lake Avenue, including the possibility of a dedicated rapid-transit bus lane in the center median …

… building out our bicycle spine network,

… installing more pedestrian crosswalks,

… and incorporating enhancements like flashing yield signs and raised walkways.

This is just a short overview of our plans to make our streets safer for everybody.

You can learn more about this initiative on our website at www.cityofRochester.gov/visionzero.

Thank you again for your interest in ROC Vision Zero, and for this this opportunity to talk about it.

 Malik Evans is mayor of Rochester.

The Beacon welcomes comments and letters from readers who adhere to our comment policy including use of their full, real nameSee “Leave a Reply” below to discuss on this post. Comments of a general nature may be submitted to the Letters page by emailing  [email protected]

2 thoughts on “Even one traffic fatality or serious injury is too many

  1. Honest to goodness, is anyone in this city, city hall, or of a political stripe this incredibly foolish? Exactly how does a city of over 200,000 people reduce traffic accidents, fatalities, injuries, etc., to ZERO.

    The Mayor says ” Rochester is the only city in the state outside of New York to adopt the Vision Zero initiative to *eliminate* all traffic fatalities and serious injuries.” How possibly can he believe this is an achievable goal, or that once Vision Zero is implemented in full, that suddenly, out of the blue, we, as a city; will forever and a day be down to zero traffic mishaps, speeding, reckless driving and drunk driving?

    I can see where the Mayor wants to be seen as a beacon of light in helping to reduce traffic accidents of all kinds. But to think – even for a moment – that this is a realistic and attainable goal – takes a leap of faith that I am not willing to grant or accept.

    Unless and until such time as Rochester is to become suddenly bereft of liquor stores, bars, vehicle mechanical issues, cars, motorcycles, roads, streets, walkways, sidewalks, automobiles that can go no faster than 10mph, and with the rest of the population of former drivers and car owners now being relegated to walking at a slow speed – I do not see the significance, worth or value of such a signature statement and program alliance.

    Who comes up with this stuff and why is it that our (always) liberally-inclined Mayor never seems to accept common-sense, more conservative initiatives – many of which are sorely needed and acceptable to a large percentage of the electorate. Yet seems to glom on to almost any and every idea handed down by this and other progressive organizations, think tanks, or “feel good” initiatives that are proposed in other markets and more – but have yet to fully realize the 21st century goals they’ve been aching to implement – or have failed on spectacular levels once implemented and proven to be massive failures.

    I find these kinds of initiatives to be more along the line of “scatter-shot” proposals that sound good, but, in the end, will do nothing to quell the carnage we see on our streets and highways – and are more along the line of throwing darts at the wall to see what sticks. Further, for all intents and purposes; this initiative reminds me more along the lines and equivalent of our idiotic “gun buy-back’ programs that have never done one damn thing in improving our statistics on gun related crimes in the city, and even less than nothing on bringing to heel the violent element that seems to roam our streets with impunity.

    I’m sorry, Mr. Mayor; but, once again, you propose a solution to a societal problem that has been in existence since the dawning of the automobile. And to foolishly believe that anything in this “program” will stem the tide of vehicular carnage on our streets, is just that- foolishness with a capital F.

    • You are absolutely correct. Apart from banning all vehicular traffic within the city limits of Rochester, there will always be vehicular fatalities.
      One might wonder how many fatalities occurred in the “good old days” of hose-drawn carriages.
      I doubt if any serious studies have been done regarding those incidents, but I am sure some must have occurred.
      The current mayor’s pious pronouncements are typical of what Citygov (both the mayor’s office and city council) have been offering Rochester’s residents for decades in order for it to appear “relevant” in addressing issues for which there are no logical solutions.
      They want to appear as thou they are doing something, anything, to justify their existence, their prestige and their paychecks.
      The function of Citygov is merely to provide for and maintain essential services, NOT to enact unenforceable legislation or propose programs that will never have any effect other than to provide opportunities for elected officials to hold press conferences or attempt to make a splash at community meetings.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *